Sebastian Schkudlara
🚀 Meta’s Big Claim: The Dawn of Self-Improving AI
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg says we’re on the edge of something huge: AI systems that can improve themselves. In a newly published strategy paper, “The Future of Superintelligence,” he suggests that we’re approaching a world where AI no longer needs humans to get better.
“The improvement is still slow, but undeniable,” Zuckerberg writes.
To lead this charge, Meta has launched its own Superintelligence Lab, snatching up top talent from OpenAI, DeepMind, and Apple. Some contracts reportedly top $500 million, with overall investments already hitting the multi-billion-dollar range.
🧠 The Vision: Your AI, Everywhere
While others focus on AI for business or automation, Meta wants to give you a “personal superintelligence.”
Picture this: smart assistants built into your daily life—like Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses—that learn from everything you do, hear, and see. The goal? A proactive assistant that helps you write, learn, plan, and act more effectively.
Always on. Always watching. Always helping?
🧱 Meta’s New Direction: Closing the Open-Source Doors
Once praised for releasing its powerful Llama models as open source, Meta is now changing course. Future releases may be locked behind closed doors.
“Superintelligence will raise new safety concerns. We need to be rigorous about mitigating these risks and cautious about what we release.”
This marks a clear pivot: from openness to controlled secrecy. As AI systems grow more capable—and more potentially dangerous—Meta seems to be tightening its grip.
⚠️ Not Everyone Is Buying the Hype
However, not everyone in the tech and journalistic world is embracing Meta’s new stance with open arms.
✍️ Enter Lina Knees: The Sharpest Critic Yet
In her searing editorial, “Meta’s Superintelligence Is a Complete Nightmare,” journalist Lina Knees argues that Meta’s vision is less utopia, more dystopia.
🔍 Empowerment or Surveillance?
Knees calls out the always-on data collection behind Meta’s “personal AI.” With wearables that track what you see and hear, she warns this isn’t just helpful—it’s invasive.
“Every argument with your partner, every meeting, every trip to the bathroom—all could land in Meta’s black box.”
Rather than giving power to users, she says Meta is building the world’s most intimate surveillance machine—and calling it innovation.
🕵️♂️ Transparency—But Only From You
What makes critics even more uneasy: while Meta wants everything about you to be visible to AI, the AI itself is becoming increasingly opaque.
“Meta wants transparent users, but opaque models.”
According to Knees, this imbalance benefits Meta—who gains insight and control—while users are left in the dark about how their own data is used.
❌ Meta vs. Regulators
Meta is also refusing to sign the EU’s voluntary AI code of conduct—a major red flag to regulators and consumer advocates. The code calls for transparency around training data and safety commitments.
Worse, Meta stands accused of using Facebook and Instagram user data without consent, echoing the ghost of Cambridge Analytica and fueling fears of AI-enhanced manipulation.
💰 The Business Model? You.
Even if superintelligence takes years to arrive, Knees argues Meta’s already winning—by turning personal data into profit.
“Whether superintelligence becomes reality is unclear. But that Meta will make vast sums of money off your personal data—that’s already happening.”
⚖️ The Superintelligence Divide: Meta’s Vision vs. Critics’ Concerns
| Aspect | Meta’s Narrative | Critics’ Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | AI that empowers individuals | Centralized power and data extraction |
| Data Use | Personalized learning via opt-in wearables | Mass surveillance disguised as personalization |
| Openness | Responsible, risk-adjusted open source | Strategic secrecy that blocks scrutiny |
| Regulation | “Careful collaboration” with lawmakers | Active resistance to transparency and oversight |
| Privacy Model | User-first design with future-proof controls | Total user exposure, no algorithmic accountability |
🧭 Final Thoughts: A New Frontier, or a Familiar Warning?
There’s no question that Meta is advancing the frontiers of AI. Self-improving systems, personal assistants, and wearable tech could change how we live and work forever.
But the central question remains:
Will this technology truly serve people—or serve the people who own the platforms?
As the race for superintelligence heats up, so does the debate around consent, power, and control. And if history is any guide, transparency and regulation may matter just as much as the tech itself.
What are your thoughts on Meta’s superintelligence ambitions? Share your perspective in the comments below!
🚀 Unleash the Power of Specialization: Dive Deep into Our Infinitely Extensible AI Ecosystem
